Text-to-Text Search via BERT#

Searching large amounts of text documents with text queries is a very popular use-case, so of course Finetuner enables you to accomplish this easily.

This guide will lead you through an example use-case to show you how Finetuner can be used for text to text retrieval.


In Finetuner, two BERT models are supported as backbones, namely bert-base-cased and sentence-transformers/msmarco-distilbert-base-v3, both of which are models hosted on Hugging Face.

In this example, we will fine-tune bert-base-cased on the Quora Question Pairs dataset, where the search task involves finding duplicate questions in the dataset. An example query for this search task might look as follows:

How can I be a good geologist?

Retrieved documents that could be duplicates for this question should then be ranked in the following order:

What should I do to be a great geologist?
How do I become a geologist?
What do geologists do?

We will use BERT as an embedding model that embeds texts in a high dimensional space. We can fine-tune BERT so that questions that are duplicates of each other are represented in close proximity and questions that are not duplicates will have representations that are further apart in the embedding space. In this way, we can rank the embeddings in our search space by their proximity to the query question and return the highest ranking duplicates.

See Also: Model and dataset info

If you’d like more information about the BERT model we are fine-tuning please visit Hugging Face. Supplementary information about the Quora Question Pairs dataset can be found on the Sentence-Transformers website.


We will use the Quora Question Pairs dataset to show-case Finetuner for text to text search. We have already pre-processed this dataset and made it available for you to pull from hubble. Do this as follows:

from docarray import DocumentArray

train_data = DocumentArray.pull('quora_train.da')
query_data = DocumentArray.pull('quora_query_dev.da')
index_data = DocumentArray.pull('quora_index_dev.da')


Your train_data DocumentArray summary should look like this:

╭──────────────── Documents Summary ────────────────╮
│                                                   │
│   Length                 104598                   │
│   Homogenous Documents   True                     │
│   Common Attributes      ('id', 'text', 'tags')   │
│   Multimodal dataclass   False                    │
│                                                   │
╭───────────────────── Attributes Summary ─────────────────────╮
│                                                              │
│   Attribute   Data type   #Unique values   Has empty value   │
│  ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────  │
│   id          ('str',)    104598           False             │
│   tags        ('dict',)   104598           False             │
│   text        ('str',)    104559           False             │
│                                                              │

So we have 104598 training Documents. Each Document consists of a text field that contains the question, as well as a finetuner_label which indicates the label to which the question belongs. If multiple questions have the same label, they are duplicates of one another. If they have different finetuner_labels, they are not duplicates of each other.

As for the evaluation dataset, we load query_data and index_data separately. The query_data has the same structure as the train_data, consisting of labelled documents. The index_data is the data against which the queries will be matched, and contains many documents, some of which may be irrelevant to the queries (ie. they have no duplicated in the query_data). If you look at the summaries for the query_data and index_data, you will find that they have the following number of instances:

Length of queries DocumentArray: 5000
Length of index DocumentArray: 15746

Backbone model#

To keep things simple, we have decided to fine-tune the BERT model bert-base-cased. We could also have chosen sentence-transformers/msmarco-distilbert-base-v3 as our base model, which has already been fine-tuned on the MSMarco dataset. However, for the purpose of this experiment, we want to explore how much improvement in performance we can gain from fine-tuning bert-base-cased on the Quora Question Pairs dataset using Finetuner. Perhaps in the future, we might want to create another run where we experiment with fine-tuning other BERT models.


Finetuner also supports fine-tuning other models, see the choose backbone section.


Now that we have the training and evaluation datasets loaded as DocumentArrays and selected our model, we can start our fine-tuning run.

import finetuner
from finetuner.callback import EvaluationCallback

# Make sure to login to Jina Cloud

# Start fine-tuning as a run within an experiment
    learning_rate = 1e-5,

Our fine-tuning call has a lot of arguments. Let’s discuss what the most important ones are responsible for.

Most importantly, we select our model with model='bert-base-cased' and pass our training data with train_data=train_data. These two arguments are required. We set our experiment_name to 'finetune-quora-dataset' and our run_name to 'finetune-quora-dataset-bert-base-cased'. This will make it easy for us to retrieve the experiment and run in the future. We also provide a short description of our run, just for some extra context.

For this run, we select Finetuner’s 'TripletMarginLoss' and 'TripletMarginMiner', as they are most relevant for our use-case. The 'TripletMarginLoss' measures the similarity between three tensors, namely the anchor, a positive sample and a negative sample. This makes sense for our task, since we want duplicate questions to have representations closer together, while non-duplicates should have more dissimilar representations. Likewise, the 'TripletMarginMiner' outputs a tuple of size 3, with an anchor, a positive sample and a negative sample.

See Also: TripletMarginLoss and TripletMarginMiner

More information about TripletMarginLoss and TripletMarginMiner can be found in the PyTorch and metric learning documentation respectively.

Lastly, we provide an EvaluationCallback with our query_data and index_data. This evaluation is done at the end of each epoch and its results will be visible to us in the logs, which we will monitor in the next section. Since we have not specified which metrics should be applied, default metrics will be computed. The Evaluation section of this guide will show you the default metrics.


Now that we’ve created a run, let’s see its status. You can monitor the run by checking the status - run.status() or the logs - run.logs().

{'status': 'CREATED', 'details': 'Run submitted and awaits execution'}

Since some runs might take up to several hours, you can reconnect to your run very easily to monitor its status.

import finetuner

run = finetuner.get_run('finetune-quora-dataset-bert-base-cased')
print(f'Run status: {run.status()}')


Our EvaluationCallback during fine-tuning ensures that after each epoch, an evaluation of our model is run. We can access the evaluation results in the logs as follows:

import finetuner

run = finetuner.get_run('finetune-quora-dataset-bert-base-cased')
print(f'Run logs: {run.logs()}')
  Training [3/3] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 818/818 0:00:00 0:03:05 • loss: 0.000
[15:36:40] DEBUG    Metric: 'model_average_precision' Value: 0.95728                                     __main__.py:202
           DEBUG    Metric: 'model_dcg_at_k' Value: 1.33912                                              __main__.py:202
           DEBUG    Metric: 'model_f1_score_at_k' Value: 0.13469                                         __main__.py:202
           DEBUG    Metric: 'model_hit_at_k' Value: 0.99720                                              __main__.py:202
           DEBUG    Metric: 'model_ndcg_at_k' Value: 0.97529                                             __main__.py:202
           DEBUG    Metric: 'model_precision_at_k' Value: 0.07653                                        __main__.py:202
           DEBUG    Metric: 'model_r_precision' Value: 0.94393                                           __main__.py:202
           DEBUG    Metric: 'model_recall_at_k' Value: 0.99301                                           __main__.py:202
           DEBUG    Metric: 'model_reciprocal_rank' Value: 0.96686                                       __main__.py:202
           INFO     Done ✨                                                                              __main__.py:204
           INFO     Saving fine-tuned models ...                                                         __main__.py:207
           INFO     Saving model 'model' in /usr/src/app/tuned-models/model ...                          __main__.py:218
[15:36:41] INFO     Pushing saved model to Hubble ...                                                    __main__.py:225
[15:37:32] INFO     Pushed model artifact ID: '62b9cb73a411d7e08d18bd16'                                 __main__.py:231
           INFO     Finished 🚀                                                                          __main__.py:233                                                  __main__.py:225


Once your run has successfully completed, you can save your fine-tuned model in the following way:


That’s it! Now you have a fine-tuned model which is ready to be integrated with the Jina ecosystem.